Vikipedio:Ne faru originalan esploradon: Malsamoj inter versioj

sen resumo de redaktoj
Rilate al la politiko de Vikipedio oni uzas la jenajn difinojn de unuaranga, duaranga kaj triaranga fonto:
*'''Unuarangaj fontoj''' estas fontoj tre proksimaj al la origino de specifa temo. Okula atestanto de trafika kolizio estas ekzemplo de unuaranga fonto. Oni rajtas uzi unuarangajn fontojn publikigitajn de fidinda fonto en Vikipedio, sed oni atentu ĉar estas facile misuzi ilin. Tial iu ajn nefakulo, kiu legis la unuarangan fonton, devus kapabli konfirmi, ke la Vikipedia eltiraĵo kongruas kun la unuaranga fonto.
<-!-- For that reason, anyone—without specialist knowledge—who reads the primary source should be able to verify that the Wikipedia passage agrees with the primary source. Any interpretation of primary source material requires a reliable secondary source for that interpretation. To the extent that part of an article relies on a primary source, it should:
:* only make descriptive claims about the information found in the primary source, the accuracy and applicability of which is easily verifiable by any reasonable, educated person without specialist knowledge, and
:*make no analytic, synthetic, interpretive, explanatory, or evaluative claims about the information found in the primary source.
:Examples of primary sources include archeological artifacts; photographs; historical documents such as diaries, census results, video or transcripts of surveillance, public hearings, trials, or interviews; tabulated results of surveys or questionnaires; written or recorded notes of laboratory and field research, experiments or observations, published experimental results by the person(s) actually involved in the research; original philosophical works, religious scripture, administrative documents, and artistic and fictional works such as poems, scripts, screenplays, novels, motion pictures, videos, and television programs.<ref>Definitions of primary sources:
*The [ University of Nevada, Reno Libraries] define primary sources as providing "an inside view of a particular event." They offer as examples: '''original documents''', such as autobiographies, diaries, e-mail, interviews, letters, minutes, news film footage, official records, photographs, raw research data, and speeches; '''creative works''', such as art, drama, films, music, novels, poetry; and '''relics or artifacts''', such as buildings, clothing, DNA, furniture, jewelry, pottery.
*The [ University of California, Berkeley library] offers this definition: "Primary sources enable the researcher to get as close as possible to what actually happened during an historical event or time period. Primary sources were either created during the time period being studied, or were created at a later date by a participant in the events being studied (as in the case of memoirs) and they reflect the individual viewpoint of a participant or observer."</ref>
:Unsourced material obtained from a Wikipedian's personal experience, such as an unpublished eyewitness account, should not be added to articles. It would violate both this policy and [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|Verifiability]], and would cause Wikipedia to become a primary source for that material.