Enhavo forigita Enhavo aldonita
→‎Baloto pri forigo de Portalo Pedofilio: response/questions/comments
Linio 16:
 
:Thank you very much for your reaction. I do not know to which extend you are able to understand and read Esperanto, but if you are, please have a look to the [[Portalo:Pedofilio]] in its actual form and you will understand that it is in this form never acceptable for Wikipedia as this is exactly just a glorification of paedophilia. More: For example the window ''Naskiĝoj de la monato'' gives the impression that all the persons named at this place are paedophiles or members of the paedophile movement - which is just complete nonsense. The problem is that if we want to have such a portal we would need the staff to revise it. But the only contributor to this portal was Pangea who evidently presents with all his contributions are in a way that an objective reader only can assume that the goal is to promote paedophilia as acceptable to society! In any case in the actual form we cannot conserve this portal. If we want to keep it, it would be necessary to remake it completely. And as our staff is limited (and also the extend and number of articles related to this subject is not really significant) it makes more sense to integrate texts with relation to paedophilia in another portal like social questions or similar. In any case a portal makes no sense if there is only one contributor to it![[Uzanto:DidiWeidmann|DidiWeidmann]] ([[Uzanto-Diskuto:DidiWeidmann|diskuto]]) 16:14, 2 Jan. 2014 (UTC)
::Hi Didi, thanks for the message. I have been able to follow the discussion somewhat thanks to Google Translate. The comments that I made were independent of the current status of articles relating to paedophilia on Esperanto. I have seen articles on Interlingua (I think it was) Wikipedia which were much as you described here; glorification of paedophilia, and this is wrong. Not speaking Esperanto, I will take your word for it that the articles here on this project are much the same way. If all things being equal, and if articles here on this project were NPOV and reflected real world realities (i.e. no glorification of paedophilia), then yes, I think Esperanto Wikipedia could be progressive and lead the way for other projects on having such a portal. But if the case as you state is the actual state of affairs with the article, then it is obviously not a good idea to have a separate portal at this time.
 
::In relation to article content, we obviously need to assume good faith of editors, and [[User:Pangea]] may not actually be using Esperanto Wikipedia to advocate for paedophilia; it may just be that their editing isn't NPOV. If the latter is the case, then they ma want a mentor to help them to learn how to write in an NPOV way. If, however, they are using the project to advocate for something that is not accepted by society-at-large, then obviously other measures need to be taken. Now might be the time for Esperanto Wikipedia to consider implementing a policy along the lines of [[:en:Wikipedia:Child protection]]. I would be happy to get involved (again, I don't speak Esperanto) in helping to get the Esperanto Wikipedia to implement such a policy. What do you think? [[Uzanto:Russavia|Russavia]] ([[Uzanto-Diskuto:Russavia|diskuto]]) 16:48, 2 Jan. 2014 (UTC)