Norda poluso: Malsamoj inter versioj

Alia malaprobo de la aserto de Peary alvenis en 2009, kiam [[E. Myles Standish]] de la [[Kalifornia Instituto de Teknologio]], sperta arbitraciisto de sciencaj asertoj, raportis multajn kvazaŭajn [[Lakuno (filologio)|lakunojn]] kaj faktkonfliktojn.<ref name="DIOI">[http://www.dioi.org/spe.htm Roald Amundsen First to Each Pole – Three Prior North Pole Claims: Each Unproven & Highly Suspect]. Dioi.org. Alirita la 4an de Julio 2012.</ref>

La unua postulita flugo super la Poluso estis produktitaokazinta la 9an de majo 1926 fare de US mararmea usona oficiro [[Richard E. Byrd]] kaj piloto [[Floyd Bennett]] enper Fokker-tri-motora aviadilo. Kvankam konfirmite tiutempe fare de komisiono de la [[National Geographic Society]], tiu aserto poste estis subfosita<ref>[http://library.osu.edu/sites/archives/polar/flight/controversy.php The North Pole Flight of Richard E. Byrd: An Overview of the Controversy], Byrd Polar Research Center of The Ohio State University. See also [12http://www.dioi.org/vols/wa0.pdf ''DIO''] Vol. 10 [2000] (refereed both at University of Cambridge and by the ''DIO'' board), which reveals errors of grade school arithmetic in the Byrd-defenses of W.Molett (pp. 55 & 98) and consultant J. Portney (pp. 73–75), neither of whom attempts to explain Byrd's surgical censoring of his original June report, or his and the National Geographic's hiding of said report for decades. Similarly, Avery's chimeral try at replicating the Peary 1909 trip via 2005 ice, may divert from but cannot explain Peary's data-blanks, data-alterations, nor why he, when reading his diary to Congress on 7 January 1911, understandably [http://www.dioi.org/cot.htm#wpst deleted] (only) its sole attempt at explaining (crudely and inadequately) his steering: "setting course by moon, our shadows etc". See ''The Washington Post'' 20 April 1989. Compare diary 2 April 1909 to p. 302 of the Peary Hearings: complete verbatim copy at 1916 ''Congressional Record'' Vol. 53, Appendix pp. 293–327.</ref> per la revelacio (1996) ke la sunajsunsekstantaj sekstanto datenojinformoj de la long-kaŝajdumlonge kaŝita taglibro de Byrd (kiujnkiun la NGS neniam kontrolis) konstante kontraŭdiras paralelajn datenojn de lia raporto de junio 1926 paralelajn datenojn je pli ol 100 mejl.mejloj (160 km). <ref>[13http://www.nytimes.com/1996/05/09/did-byrd-reach-pole-his-diary-hints-no.html Did Byrd Reach Pole? His Diary Hints 'No']. ''The New York Times''. (9a de Majo 1996). Alirita la 2012-07-04.</ref> La kvazaŭaj survoje sunajsunsekstantaj sekstantodatenojdatenoj de la sekreta raporto estis preterintence tiel maleble overpreciseoverprecize ke li forigis ĉiujn tiujn kvazaŭajn krudajn sunajn observaĵojn el la versio de la raporto finfine sendita al geografiaj socioj kvin monatojn poste (dum la originalversiooriginala versio estis kaŝita dum 70 jaroj), realigonrealigo unueunuafoje publikigitenpublikigita en 2000 fare de la Universitato de Kembriĝo post skrupula arbitraciado.<ref>D. Rawlins ''[[Polar Record]]'' (Scott Polar Research Institute) vol. 36 pp. 25–50. SPRI's preface: the paper "is considered to be of such significance to the community that it has been published here despite an expanded version being published this same month in ''DIO''." Both versions (p. 38 and 59, respectively) note that while Byrd's New York ticker-tape parade and his National Geographic Society gold medal presentation were on 23 June 1926, the NGS exam of his later-hidden original report was from early 23 June through late 28 June (six days, mistakenly cited as "five consecutive days" in the report), a chronology so revealing that the September ''National Geographic'' pp. 384–385 stripped out the dates (only) from the NGS' own report, which fortunately was published uncensored (thanks to the Secretary of the Navy) at ''The New York Times'' 30 June, p. 5.</ref>