Diskuto:Liancourt-Rokoj: Malsamoj inter versioj

Enhavo forigita Enhavo aldonita
Neniu resumo de redakto
Linio 4:
--[[Vikipediisto:Boldlyman|Boldlyman]] 10:05, 23. Sep 2007 (UTC)
::I agree with [[Vikipediisto:Boldlyman|Boldlyman]]. Alphabetical order is a most neutralism and reasonable. Why is it unnecessary? I cannot see any reason. Also, What Zen??? I cannot understand what are you talking about.--[[Vikipediisto:Aljarreau|Aljarreau]] 16:21, 28. Sep 2007 (UTC)
:I am sick of JPOV. As a human being, extreme ethnocentrism is morally wrong. I do not think that Japan, in any reason what so ever, should be considered "more important" than Korea. It is obvious that the Japanese users, or their suporters are "Japan-ifing" East Asia related articles in the English Wikipedia. I do not want those kind of actions to carry over to the Esperanto Wikipedia, the ''international'' wikipedia. A good example of "Japan-ism" is shown here:
*[[en:Zen]]
*[[en:Liancourt Rocks]]
Take a look at the side bars for each of the two articles. The Liancourt Rocks uses the Alphabetical Rule (Japan comes before Korea). But, in the article Zen, the Alphabetical Order Rule is not used ('''Japan comes before China'''). This proves that the Japanese users are not actually working for NPOV, but for JPOV. I do not want the same mistake to happen in the Esperanto Wikipedia. All I am doing here is to make things truly NPOV. I have no intentions to make any article a POV for anything. Merci. [[Vikipediisto:Amphitere|Amphitere]]
Reiri al la paĝo "Liancourt-Rokoj".