Alger Hiss: Malsamoj inter versioj
| [kontrolita revizio] | [kontrolita revizio] |
Enhavo forigita Enhavo aldonita
Kani (diskuto | kontribuoj) Neniu resumo de redakto |
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.5 |
||
Linio 7:
*"... the vast majority [tiel] of modern American historians today and particularly those specializing in domestic Cold War accept Chambers' overall version of events."
{{cite web| last = Oshinsky| first = David| title = Transcript, Alger Hiss and History, Inaugural Conference| publisher = New York University, Center for the United States and the Cold War| date = 5a de Aprilo, 2007| url = http://www.nyu.edu/library/bobst/research/tam/hiss_david_oshinsky.pdf| author-link = David Oshinsky}}<br>
*"Yet the weight of historical evidence indicates that Hiss was ... a member of the communist underground and a Soviet spy." {{Cite news| last =Elson| first =John| title =Gentleman and Spy?| work =Time| date =November 25, 1996| url =http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,985571-1,00.html| access-date =2a de Aŭgusto, 2007| archive-date =
*"The case against Hiss, which has been strong but controversial ever since his conviction for perjury... is now overwhelming as a result of new evidence... from the VENONA decrypts, KGB files made available to Weinstein and Vassiliev... and Hungarian interrogation records of Hiss's fellow agent Noel Field."{{cite book|last1=Andrew|first1=Christopher|last2=Mitrokhin|first2=Vasili|title=The Sword and the Shield: The Mitrokhin Archive and the Secret History of the KGB|date=1999|publisher=Basic Books|location=New York|isbn=978-0-465-00310-5|page=[https://archive.org/details/swordshieldmitro00andr/page/591 591]|url=https://archive.org/details/swordshieldmitro00andr/page/591}}
*"In the end, the publication of the Venona intercepts ... settled the matter— to all but the truest of believers." {{cite web| last =[http://www.law.wisc.edu/profiles/sikutler@wisc.edu Stanley I. Kutler]| title =Rethinking the Story of Alger Hiss| work =FindLaw| date =
''Sed'':<br>
*"Most historians have conceded the argument to Weinstein. They have done so, however, not because the evidence against Hiss is clear and definitive, but because the evidence box—filled as it is with a morass of circumstantial detail—leaves them the easy option of finding him guilty of some form of espionage activity during his murky relationship with Chambers." {{Cite journal| author1 =Bird, Kai| author2 =Chervonnaya, Svetlana| title =The Mystery of Ales| journal =American Scholar| date =Summer 2007| url =http://www.theamericanscholar.org/the-mystery-of-ales-2}}
| |||