|
==Avantaĝoj==
Plurelektaj demandaroj estas pli rapide kontrolitaj ol demandaroj kun skribaj respondoj. Tiu avantaĝo estas eĉ pli granda, kiam oni uzas programon por kontroli la respondojn. Respondoj al tiaj demandaroj estas klaraj ke ne pridubindaj, se la respondanto scipovas uzi la respondformularon.
<!--
There are several advantages to the multiple choice style. If item writers are well trained and items are quality assured, this can be a very effective item format.<ref>[http://www.nbme.org/publications/item-writing-manual-download.html Item Writing Manual] by the National Board of Medical Examiners</ref> First of all, if students are instructed on the way in which the item format works and the myths surrounding the assessment type are destroyed, students are found to perform better on the test.<ref>Lutz Beckert, Tim J Wilkinson, Richard Sainsbury (2003) A needs-based study and examination skills course improves students' performance Medical Education 37 (5), 424–428.doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01499.x</ref> On many assessments, reliability has been shown to improve with larger numbers of items on a test, and with good sampling and care over case specificity overall test reliability can be further increased.<ref name="Downing">Steven M Downing (2004) Reliability: on the reproducibility of assessment data Medical Education 38 (9), 1006–1012.
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01932.x </ref>
Multiple choice tests often require less time to administer for a given amount of material than would tests requiring written responses. Even greater efficiency can be created by use of online examination delivery software. Multiple choice questions lend themselves to the development of objective assessment items, however, without author training, questions can be subjective in nature. Because this style of test does not require a teacher to mark the given answers, test-takers are graded purely on their selections, creating a lower likelihood of teacher-student [[bias]] in the results. Finally, if test-takers are aware of how to use mark sheets and/or online examination tick boxes their responses can be relied upon with clarity.
-->
==Malavantaĝoj==
Unu el la malavantaĝoj de plurelektaj demandaroj estas ambiguo, ĉar la respondanto ne povas aldoni komenton, kiu eble pravigus la respondon. Pro tio kelkaj demandaroj nun aldonas lokon por ''liberan respondon'', kie la respondanto povas argumenti sian respondon.
<!--
Multiple choice tests do have disadvantages. One of these is ambiguity; failing to interpret information as the test maker intended can result in an "incorrect" response, even if the taker's response is potentially valid. The term "multiple guess" has been used to describe this scenario because test-takers may attempt to guess rather than determine the correct answer. A [[free response]] test allows the test taker to make an argument for their viewpoint and potentially receive credit.
In addition, even if a student has some knowledge of a question, they receive no credit for knowing that information if they select the wrong answer. However, free response questions may allow a taker to demonstrate their understanding of the subject and receive partial credit. Finally, test takers may be able to rule out answers due to infeasibility. In some cases they may even test each answer individually, especially when dealing with [[mathematics]], thereby increasing the chance of providing a correct answer without actually knowing the subject matter. On the other hand, especially on mathematics tests, some answers are included to actually encourage the test taker to logically rule out responses. An example would be giving the equation <math>4x^2 + bx=3</math> and asking what <math>b^2</math> equals. The test taker should be able to eliminate all answers that are a [[negative number]].
Alia malavantaĝo, ĉefe pri matematikaj demandoj estas, ke la respondanto povas individue kontroli ĉiun proponitan solvon, sen vere scipovi solvi la ekvacion.
The use of multiple choice questions in certain educational fields is sometimes contested due to some of the negative aspects, whether actual or perceived, but the format remains popular due to its utility and cost effectiveness.
Hazarde ĝusta respondo povas kredigi, ke la respondinto regas la fakon. Por eviti tion, iuj sistemoj pli alte taksas nenian respondon ol malbonan respondon.
Another disadvantage of multiple choice examinations is that a student who is incapable of answering a particular question can simply select a random answer and still have a chance of recieving a mark for it. It is not unknown for students with no time left to give all remaining questions random answers in the hope that they will get at least some of them right. Some exams, such as the [[Australian Mathematics Competition]], have systems in place to negate this, in this case by making it more beneficial to not give an answer than to give a wrong one.
-->
==Ekzemploj==
;Referencoj
----
<references/>
[[Kategorio:Edukado]]
| 