LR0725

Bui Quoc Huy

Please see en:User talk:Someone who's wrong on the internet#Bui Quoc Huy: spam?. There is local consensus to keep this page. Someone who's wrong on the internet (diskuto) 22:57, 1 apr. 2023 (UTC)

Keeping global spam seems weird, but ok. LR0725 (diskuto) 03:33, 2 apr. 2023 (UTC)

I guess the community decided that the topic was sufficiently notable and there was enough salvageable content to keep the article. Someone who's wrong on the internet (diskuto) 13:15, 2 apr. 2023 (UTC)

It is good event that they made enough content for page. Nice job. LR0725 (diskuto) 13:18, 2 apr. 2023 (UTC)

Hi

Mi ne estas Smagazine kaj ŝanĝas la fonton sur Bui Quoc Huy. ne reveni. Ŝajnas, ke vi konfuzas min kun iu. Bonvolu ne reveni dum mi riparas, bonvolu respekti --Superwiki999 (diskuto) 17:56, 6 maj. 2023 (UTC)

I am not Smagazine and am changing the source on Bui Quoc Huy. not revert. Looks like you're confusing me with someone. Please don't revert while I'm repairing, please respect--Superwiki999 (diskuto) 17:56, 6 maj. 2023 (UTC)

en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Smagzine/Archive#02 May 2023 Well. Ok, bye, Smagzine. --LR0725 (diskuto) 17:57, 6 maj. 2023 (UTC)

안녕하세요! I changed my mind after the last weeks edits on Bui Quoc Huy, voted for deletion and that was the deciding point to delete the page also here. So this chapter is finally closed here, too. The text could have easily survived, if not repeatedly new statements were added and referenced by random websites in a silly way. But probably these are the dynamics of "global spam" edits. Cheers, ThomasPusch (diskuto) 18:47, 7 maj. 2023 (UTC)

@ThomasPusch: I respect your right decision. That global sockpuppet user's spam is seriously on-going all over the global wikis. So if that sock appears again at eowiki, report at meta steward request, please. Thank you. LR0725 (diskuto) 19:02, 7 maj. 2023 (UTC)